Research informs a verdict; it never becomes content to adapt. Anything external that proposes a rule enters tier B — hypothesis, no provenance until a human ratifies, and the ratifier becomes the parent.
A rights position checked in March is not current in September. A stale finding is not deleted and not silently refreshed — it is marked, and the original snapshot remains because the Dossier must still state what was known at decision time. A re-check writes a new snapshot beside the old one; a diff between them is the valuable output.
Cmd+Enter to capture · one source per capture
Before a decision ships, something outside the house sometimes has to be checked. You state what you need to establish and where it lives; what comes back is evidence — snapshotted, hashed and attached to the rule or verdict it informs — never content to adapt. The cases this surface exists for:
Is 2026-05-27 a public observance in the AE this year?
an edition shipping that week must not schedule against an observance · class: observance
Has this artwork's estate published a position on reproduction?
a cover candidate whose rights the rights layer does not already settle · class: rights
What is the regulator's current wording on influencer disclosure?
a rule candidate in tier B — hypothesis until a human ratifies it · class: regulator